14 days 3.4.2018 $12/page
10 days 30.3.2018 $13/page
7 days 27.3.2018 $14/page
5 days 25.3.2018 $15/page
3 days 23.3.2018 $16/page
48 hours 22.3.2018 $19/page
24 hours 21.3.2018 $24/page
8 hours 20.3.2018 $27/page
- 14 days 3.4.2018 $15/page
10 days 30.3.2018 $16/page
7 days 27.3.2018 $17/page
5 days 25.3.2018 $18/page
3 days 23.3.2018 $19/page
48 hours 22.3.2018 $22/page
24 hours 21.3.2018 $27/page
8 hours 20.3.2018 $33/page
- 14 days 3.4.2018 $18/page
10 days 30.3.2018 $19/page
7 days 27.3.2018 $20/page
5 days 25.3.2018 $21/page
3 days 23.3.2018 $22/page
48 hours 22.3.2018 $25/page
24 hours 21.3.2018 $28/page
8 hours 20.3.2018 $38/page
- 14 days 3.4.2018 $21/page
10 days 30.3.2018 $22/page
7 days 27.3.2018 $25/page
5 days 25.3.2018 $27/page
3 days 23.3.2018 $30/page
48 hours 22.3.2018 $33/page
24 hours 21.3.2018 $39/page
8 hours 20.3.2018 $47/page
- 14 days 3.4.2018 $27/page
10 days 30.3.2018 $28/page
7 days 27.3.2018 $30/page
5 days 25.3.2018 $33/page
3 days 23.3.2018 $35/page
48 hours 22.3.2018 $42/page
24 hours 21.3.2018 $50/page
By the beginning of the 19th century, slavery in the U.S
Photo provided by Flickr
Under these impressions, they earnestly entreat your serious attention to the subject of slavery, that you will be pleased to countenance the restoration of liberty to those unhappy men, who, alone in this land of freedom, are degraded into perpetual bondage, and who, amidst the general joy of surrounding freemen, are groaning in servile subjection; that you will devise means for removing this inconsistency from the character of the American people; that you will promote mercy and justice towards this distressed race; and that you will step to the very verge of the power vested in you for discouraging every species of traffic in the persons of our fellow-men.
Was Slavery a Cause of the Revolutionary War
Photo provided by Flickr
The American Civil War is probably best seen as a crisis of empire. Abraham Lincoln even openly admitted it, saying that keeping the Union whole was the point of the Civil War, and that keeping blacks in slavery was acceptable to him if it kept the Union together. Most empires, from the earliest days of civilization, through Rome, Spain, the UK, and others, have largely collapsed from within, from internal corruption and imperial lands breaking away, seeking independence (to create their own empires). , and the USA is no exception, and it had been grabbing land as virtually no earthly empire had ever done before. Such unprecedented growth was bound to lead to internal friction, as imperial subjects broke away and vied for power, just as the USA originally broke away from the British Empire, soon after greatest moment of triumph.
The Book that Explains Charlottesville | Boston Review
Photo provided by Flickr
In 1851 Shadrach Minkins, an African American working as a waiter in Boston, was abducted by slave catchers. Before he could be freed by legal means in a challenge to the Fugitive Slave law, Minkins was rescued by a group of African Americans.
Caucasian is a Dirty Word. | Racism Alive And Well
In 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska Act passed, dividing the region along the 40th parallel, with Kansas to the south and Nebraska to the north, and providing both territories the right to vote on whether to be slave or free. For all practical purposes the act effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850, which had attempted to regulate the spread of slavery. As a result of the new law, both pro- and anti-slavery supporters tried to convince settlers to move to Kansas in order to sway the vote. The New England Emigrant Aid Company, an anti-slavery group, was very successful, and a group of anti-slavery activists was established around the town of Lawrence, Kansas. At the same time, pro-slavery settlers from Missouri began moving across the border to Kansas, some establishing themselves as residents of the territory, others simply coming across to vote. They were called border ruffians by their opponents. Lecompton, Kansas, the territorial capital, boiled with tension over the issue, and so-called free-soilers felt so threatened there that they set up their own unofficial legislature at Topeka. The enmity between the sides verged on civil war, and the period became known as "Bleeding Kansas."
15/10/2007 · I read it on forms
Yet our repeated attempts to effect this by prohibitions, and by imposing duties which might amount to a prohibition, have been hitherto defeated by his Majesty's negative; thus preferring the immediate advantages of a few corsairs to the lasting interests of the States, and to the rights of human nature, deeply wounded by this infamous practice.
, writes, while minister to Spain, of the abolition of slavery: "Till America comes into this measure, her prayers to Heaven will be impious.
And most annoying of all, people refer to me as such
A group of African-Americans is demanding in federal court in New
York that the United States acknowledge its culpability in the practice of
slavery. The class-action suit filed last month against three American
corporations that benefited from slavery faces major obstacles, not least
of which is the lack of legal precedent or clear historical analogy.
Although the litigation arouses great fear among critics, past cases of
reparations elsewhere indicate that the slavery lawsuit could become an
invaluable tool for bridging the racial divide in America.
It's doubtful the suit will successfully raid the coffers of Aetna,
FleetBoston Financial Corp. or CSX Corp., the three firms accused of
profiting from an institution that has been abolished since 1865. Some
people object to the court filing because none of the potential
beneficiaries of any reparations that might be gained from a successful
suit is a direct victim. To counter the criticism, one of the plaintiffs'
lawyers has promised that no individual descendants of slaves will benefit
from a financial settlement.
"This is not about individuals receiving checks in their mailbox,"
said attorney Roger Wareham, explaining that any damages awarded from the
suit will be used to create a social fund to improve health, education and
housing for African-Americans.
But this is a weak argument because it is a well-established
convention that descendants of victims are entitled to damages. Nobody
would deny a wrongful death suit because the victim is deceased. Shouldn't
descendants of slaves also be viewed as victims?
But what if the plaintiffs do get to share the wealth? Does that
diminish the suit's viability? Why should African-Americans be forced to
explain, in apologetic tones, that the reparations would be for the larger
social good as opposed to individual benefit? Because that's the legacy of
slavery: the foundation of a vast racial chasm and simmering animosity
between blacks and whites. If this suit is about anything, it should seek
finally and firmly to acknowledge and quantify the long-term suffering
caused to African-Americans by the abhorrent practice of slavery.
True, two of the most famous historical cases of reparations –
Japanese-Americans placed in internment camps during World War II and slave
laborers used by German corporations during the same period — compensated
only surviving victims. Yet descendants of survivors did receive
compensation for lost property. Neither group needed to legitimize their
claims by denying themselves personal benefit.
Which of these cases is analogous to that of African-Americans?
Probably neither. The precedents provide only general principles, and the
differences are too significant to allow a simple comparison. Slavery was
not limited to several years, nor have the economic losses of
African-Americans ever been determined in any formal way. The legacy of
slavery is racism, Jim Crow segregation, and the current racial divide.
While a communal benefit may be the most moral solution to a slavery
settlement, let's not forget that the suffering was and is personal.
If the class-action suit proceeds far enough through the legal
system, and perhaps even reaches the stage of exploring remedies, public
discussion is likely to provide momentum for a congressional hearing. An
"Eminent Persons" committee might even be appointed to study the question
Here's the question that should be on the congressional
inquisitors' lips: How much worse off are descendants of slaves because of
lingering racism? That issue would be immensely controversial, the answers
more so. But this is the normal course of political debate, and we
shouldn't shy away from it because it's uncomfortable. Despite widely
differing public viewpoints, such a discussion may encourage policy makers
(and ultimately, the public) to agree on a number that will at last
acknowledge the extent of the national debt for African-Americans'
No doubt, critics on both sides will be unsatisfied with any
quantification of the damages. Yet an agreement that would allocate funds
for housing subsidies, health care and education opportunities might be
formulated in the language of reparation and apology and thus ease the
contentiousness associated with affirmative action.
Perhaps more important, the reckoning and the possible partial
reparation could facilitate a healing process between the races, which can
only start after a sincere acknowledgement of guilt.